Minutes, Q&P Conference Call, 2-3 EST, January 23, 1996

Roll call:

1. Tom Boardman

2. Eileen Boardman

3. Terri Crosby

4. Veronica Czitrom

5. Lynne Hare

6. Roger Hoerl

7. Bob Mason

8. Innis Sande

9. Joe Skwish

10. Joe Voelkel

Action Items from Conference Call

8. Innis Sande. E-mail copy of Communications tactical plan to Joe Voelkel

9. V. Czitrom E-mail copy of Continuing. Ed. tactical plan to Joe Voelkel

10. Roger Hoerl E-mail copy of ASQC Stat Div. tactical plan to Joe Voelkel

11. Lynne Hare E-mail copy of Emerging Tech's tactical plan to Joe Voelkel

12. T. Boardman E-mail copy of home page procedures to Joe Voelkel

13. R. Hoerl Discuss integration of Emerg. Tech TP with others, with Lynne

14. Lynne Hare Discuss integration of Emerg. Tech TP with others, with Roger

15. R. Hoerl Send T. Boardman info on stat'l thinking & How To's from Stat Div

16. V. Czitrom Follow up with ASA on 4th course for continuing ed.

17. Innis Sande Discuss setting up focus group room/audience in Chicago, with Hoerl & Mason

18. R. Hoerl See # 17.

19. B. Mason See # 17.

20. R. Hoerl Send updated budget from Tim to J. Voelkel for distribution

21. T. Boardman send note to Lynne/Roger about home page (missing buttons...)

22. V. Czitrom write a job description for continuing ed, copies to Roger and Lynne

23. R. Hoerl Roger will send action items of Commun's Plan conf. call to Joe V.

24. I. Sande Check with ASA on status of member list being done with ASA.

25. R. Mason (With Leon) Create a process for transferring ongoing member updates on the Home Page to yearly updates to the operating manual.

26. *** ALL *** Read your job descriptions. If there are any problems, talk to Roger. Also, send any updates to B. Mason.

27. *** ALL *** Send any names of people you would like to see chair a contributed papers' session to R. Mee, especially names of younger members (mee@utkvx.utcc.utk.edu).

Item       Description                                     Responsibility          
1          Updating Operating Manual                       L. Hare                 
           Lynne felt the OM should updated more than annually, due to job         
           changes and so on. Tom B. said that this can be done instantaneously    
           on the home page. Roger said that the paper version will be updated     
           once/year and that more frequent changes can be sent to the Web         
           committee. (Offline conversation: a process is needed here to ensure    
           that the paper version contains the Web updates. This is the            
           responsibility of the past chair.)                                      

Item       Description                                     Responsibility          
2          Continuing Ed job description                   V. Czitrom              
           Veronica pointed out that her job description did not exist. Roger      
           asked her to write a this description, with copies to Roger and Lynne   

Item       Description                                     Responsibility          
3          Update on 7 action items of 12/1/95 conf. call  R. Hoerl                
   1.      Tom Boardman, Eileen Boardman and Ramon Leon: Develop a procedure for   
           maintaining the Q&P Homepage. Tom said they have a procedure but it     
           is not formalized. Will have a mid/late Feb conf call with              
           communication team. Essentially the procedure is: for minor changes     
           contact Ramon (or Tom or Eileen). For major changes send to Tom or      
           Eileen. Roger asked that Tom send a note to Lynne and Roger on what     
           buttons etc. still need to be filled in on the home page                
   2.      Bob Mason: Updates/corrections to Version 2 of the Q&P Operating        
           Manual Bob said these had been done and were sent from the ASA office   
           in December.                                                            
   3.      Roger Hoerl: Secure additional members for the Committee on             
           Nominations Roger said that in the future the Chair-Elect and           
           nominees for  next years chair Elect will form the committee. In this   
           way, when a person is  Chair, they will be working with people they     
           selected.                                                               
   4.      Roger Hoerl: Secure additional members for the Committee to Nominate    
           Fellows Roger said this was done: Carolyn Morgan (GE), Chair; Bob       
           Lundegard (NIST); and John Cornell (U of F).                            
   5.      Veronica Czitrom: Confirm CE course sponsorship for 1996 Chicago        
           Meetings after ASA approval of submitted courses Veronica said the      
           there were 4 courses sitting at ASA, but that she hasn't heard from     
           them. It was pointed out that ASA has not received them all, so         
           Veronica will call ASA                                                  
   6.      Innis Sande: Finalize plans for having a second Focus Group at the      
           1996 Chicago Meetings Innis said that morning on Wednesday is           
           proposed. She needs to book a room, needs to see how to do it. The      
           proposed discussion is on SPC and DOE applied to TQ, but she would      
           like some "plants" in the audience to raise questions, just in case.    
           Volunteers? Roger said that he, Innis and Bob Mason will use e-mail     
           to discuss how to set up room and who to get.                           
   7.      Tim Read: After receiving 1995 spending reports from ASA (Penny         
           Young), compile an updated 1996 Q&P budget Tim has sent Roger the       
           updated budget. Roger will send to Joe Voelkel for distribution.        

Item       Description                                     Responsibility          
3.         Emerging Technologies T.P. Status               L. Hare                 
           Lynne pointed out that these technologies seem to cross over into the   
           other T.P.'s. He has talked to Tom and Eileen about a "moderated"       
           conversation on WWW on certain statistical issues. The moderator        
           would help weed out junk and decide who can respond to questions that   
           the moderator can't answer. As an example, Joan Rosenblatt from NIST    
           has agreed to moderate a discussion--see Lynne's T.P. in Appendix 1     
           for details. This falls closest to Read's Communication's T.P.  Lynne   
           also pointed out that at NIST, there is a lot of interest in WWW.       
           Lynne can {will?}create a link from NIST to ASA's home page, to help    
           get the ball rolling.  Tom thought it was a good pilot and suggested    
           we try it. Terri saw the need for such sessions, but Lynne has moved    
           faster on it.. The amount of effort is still unknown -- volunteers      
           can join in later to help Lynne as needed.  Innis is also in favor of   
           a trial but said that, technically, putting a moderated discussion      
           the home page is  very difficult. If Rosenblatt can do it, great. The   
           Communications group had proposed a "newsgroup" for a conversation,     
           but this is not moderated.  Finally, Roger said that the clear          
           overlap here with the Homepage group and the Communication groups       
           raises the question of whether Emerging Technologies should be merged   
           in with one of these groups. Roger and Lynne will begin to discuss      
           this.                                                                   

Item       Description                                     Responsibility          
4          ASQC Stat Division Tactical Plan. Status.       Roger Hoerl             
           The plan is  1. Share info on SD projects in Amstat News and the Q&P    
           Newsletter and home page (along with pointers to Stat Division). This   
           coming weekend, Roger will meet with Stat Division people on            
           "statistical thinking." The results will be distributed to ASA          
           members as just described. 2. Provide Q&P with access to Stat           
           Division's How-To Series of books. This information will be             
           distributed as just described. 3. The Stat Division members are more    
           non-statistician oriented, so statistical research is not a priority,   
           but it is to Q&P members. The plan is for Stat Division to identify     
           research opportunities, to be disseminated to Q&P. Nancy Belunis        
           (current Stat Div chair) has given Roger some ideas, to be              
           disseminated in the June Newsletter and on the home page. 4. Joe        
           Voelkel is the official liaison between Q&P and the Stat Division.      
           His role to keep the chair in Q&P abreast of developments in Stat       
           Division that are important to Q&P, and vice-versa.                     

Item       Description                                     Responsibility          
5          Communications Tactical Plan. Status.           Innis Sande             
           Their work to date has basically been covered above. They have had      
           one conf. call, which generated action items for the next call.         
           (Roger will send these to Joe V. for attachment here).  The member      
           list is being done with ASA. She'll check up on it.                     

Item       Description                                     Responsibility          
6          Continuing Education Tactical Plan. Status      V. Czitrom              
           Agreement on a jointly sponsored course on multivariate regression is   
           pending. Joint with Computer Section. Course offered by D. Cook. Q&P    
           has no financial involvement, but we will publicize this course to      
           our members. Roger said that, per the tactical plan, we should inform   
           Q&P member of commercially available short course on our home page,     
           and people can give feedback on courses that they took.                 

Item       Description                                     Responsibility          
7          Conference call formats                         R. Hoerl                
           Roger proposed the following formats for conference calls. 1. Monthly   
           conference calls should be reserved mostly for new activities. For      
           example, for this year this would be updates on 5 items--the 4 1996     
           Tactical Plans and the Home Page. For ongoing activities, only          
           exception reports should be given, e.g. difficulties in finding         
           material for the upcomong newsletter. 2. All are invited to these       
           calls, but only a representative for each of the 5 items are needed,    
           as well as the Chair and the Secretary. Also needed are those           
           responsbile for action items from the previous conference call,         
           unless they have sent a resolution of the action item (E-mail,          
           please) to the secretary before the call. 3. Two/three large            
           conference calls per year will be also be set up. These will consist    
           of report-outs from the various committees. 4. Note that day-day        
           issues on ongoing activities should be addressed by the Operating       
           Manual, not in conference calls.                                        

Item       Description                                     Responsibility          
8          Next conference call                            R. Hoerl                
           The next conference call will be a new-activities call. It will be      
           held on March 20, from 1-2 EST. The conference call after the March     
           20 one will be a report-out conference call.                            

Item       Description                                     Responsibility          
9          (Pre-conference-call request. Added to          R. Mee                  
           minutes)
Names to chair contributed paper sessions in Chicago. Bobby Mee asked, in an E-mail to J. Voelkel before the conference call, that anyone who has any people they would like to see chair contributed papers' sessions to please pass on to him. He is especially interested in names of some of our younger members (mee@utkvx.utcc.utk.edu).
Append     Description                                     Responsibility          
1          Copy of: ASA Q&P Emerging Technologies          L. Hare                 
           (Sent from Lynne for distribution, per Roger's request)  To:  ASA Q&P   
           Leadership involved with the Web and Emerging Technologies  From:       
           Lynne Hare Subject:  Joint Effort  Friends:  At the Orlando Strategic   
           Planning meeting, three of us, Susan Devlin, Steve Zayak and I, were    
           charged with the responsibility to develop a plan to get the Section    
           more actively involved in "Emerging Technologies."  During our          
           breakout session, we learned that the three of us have different        
           views regarding emerging technologies.  Should an effort be made to     
           help put things right with regard to use and abuse of statistical       
           methods?  Should we focus on managerial(mis)understanding of            
           statistical technology?  Should we foster research into new methods     
           in statistics such as PLS and neural nets.   Since Orlando, I've been   
           struggling with what to do.  To add resource, Roger Hoerl suggested     
           we have Ramon Leon on the sub-committee.  Ramon's comment,              
           paraphrased, is that Emerging Technologies should include the web.      
           This started me thinking even more (very dangerous).  A few weeks       
           ago, I was visiting Boulder staff in my new capacity at NIST, and I     
           had the good fortune of dining with Eileen and Tom Boardman.  We told   
           old Rutgers stories and batted ET around a bit.  [Rule:  If you like    
           what follows give me the credit; if you dislike, blame Eileen and       
           Tom.]   One thought that came up was to use the web to foster ET.       
           Understand that we havevery limited resources.  We cannot hope to put   
           down all statistical heresies.We cannot be the sole, major focal        
           point for the introduction and application of new technologies.         
           However, we can provide a forum for discussion of ideas regarding ET.   
           Armed with that idea (See rule.) I returned to my lush government       
           office at NIST and contacted Joan Rosenblatt.  For those of you who     
           don't know Joan, she headed up Statistics there for many years,         
           became the director of one of NIST's eight labs, served on the ASA      
           Board, ran for ASA president and just recently retired after 41 years   
           of gov't service.  She is a marvelous statistician originally hired     
           into what was then the National Bureau of Standards by Churchill        
           Eisenhart.  In her retirement, Joan will be working in our              
           Statistical Engineering Division as a guest researcher.  I asked her    
           if she had any interest in moderating a discussion, topic of her        
           choice, on the web.  Naturally, I tried to bias her with my pet idea    
           of finding structure in very large data sets.  She said she'd think     
           about it (bad news).  A few days later when I asked her if she had      
           thought about it, she said she had and that she might want to monitor   
           a discussion on treating data that don't have numbers.  Immediately I   
           thought of treating "idea" data using such techniques as affinity       
           mapping.  She had something else in mind:  data as graphs and charts    
           (good news).   So here's the idea (See rule.)  Those of us involved     
           with the web and those of us involved with ET pool our                  
           sub-committees, brains, time and other resources and solicit web        
           discussion group leaders (e.g., Joan) to moderate discussions in        
           fields where they are comfortable.  We would have to come up with       
           some "moderator guidelines"  and we would have to assure access to      
           the net with links to their locations from the ASA Q&P home             
           page.(Details to be worked out by the Webmaster?)  We could solicit     
           moderators using the webpage, itself, and/or in the newsletter.  We     
           could even have a moderator-de-tutti-moderators(Joan) who could ride    
           herd on the whole system.   All in favor, heap praise upon me; all      
           opposed heap abuse on the Boardmans.  (Rule)   Note:  since I wrote     
           this, Roger sent me a copy of Tim Read's Q&P Communication Team         
           e-mail summarizing the results of their conference call on Dec. 4.      
           What I am suggesting above is consistent with their activities.  We     
           would augment them by giving definition and structure to the            
           conversations on the web.  (Communications Team, please let me know     
           if you think I have this wrong.)   What say?  E-mail me with your       
           comments, please by January 5.  Lynne                                   

Append     Description                                     Responsibility          
2          How the Q&P Homepage works                      T. Boardman             
           (Sent from Tom for distribution, per Roger's request)  The content of   
           the Q&P Homepage is, of course, under development. After you visit      
           the home page send suggestions for improvements and additions to the    
           web co-editors, Tom & Eileen Boardman at                                
           "boardman@lamar.colostate.edu".You can reach them from the home page    
           under "officers."  The co-editors with assistance from the Webmaster,   
           Ramon Leon, and other members of the web team will decide on content.   
           Of course, we need the help and advice from the other officers of Q&P   
           Section.  After we have some more experience with this process, we      
           likely will make changes.  Here's how you can send material to the      
           editors:  Submission of materials for the Q&P Homepage should be        
           e-mailed to Tom & Eileen Boardman. They would prefer attached files     
           in MS Word format, if possible.  If not, just include the text in     
           your e-mail.  Contact theBoardmans for details on submission if         
           needed.  They hope to include things other than text, so if you have    
           a picture which might help, send that too.  Tom                         

Append     Description                                     Responsibility          
3          Partnership with ASQC Statistics Division       R. Hoerl                
              ASA Q&P TACTICAL PLAN FOR 1996 PARTNERSHIP WITH ASQC STATISTICS      
           DIVISION Revision 1, December 22, 1995     I. Name - Partnership With   
            ASQC Statistics Division   II. Team Members - Roger Hoerl (Leader),    
               Bob Mason, Bobby Mee, Lynne Hare, Joe Voelkel (Liaison)   III.      
              Objectives - To leverage the existing and future efforts of the      
               Statistics Division to add value to our members, and allow the      
              Statistics Division to benefit from our efforts.   IV. Plan:  1.     
              Share information on the existing Statistics Division project on     
              Statistical Thinking via the Newsletter and/or Amstat News.  2.      
               Provide Q&P members with access to ASQC publications, such as       
                "How-To's".  This could be part of a standing column in the        
             Newsletter.  3. Identify and disseminate research opportunities in    
           the analysis of customer data.  Have Statistics Division identify key   
             technical issues in AMA/ASQC partnership on customer satisfaction.    
               Communicate these problem driven research opportunities to our      
              members.  4. Establish Joe Voelkel as the liaison to Statistics      
             Division from Q&P.   V.  Milestones:  1. Have something in Amstat     
           News early in 1996, and in June 1996 Newsletter.  2. Put something in   
            Amstat News by mid 1996, and in June 1996 Newsletter.  3. Summarize    
               continuing education courses from 1995 JSM in the January 1996      
           Newsletter.  Sponsor a session in this area for 1996 and/or 1997 JSM.   
            Contact Statistics Division officially in January, so that something   
            could be published in the June Newsletter, and mid 1996 Amstat News.   
            4. Discuss with Nancy Balunis of Stat Division in January, establish   
               this position in next listing of officers and next edition of       
                                     Operating Manual.